Showing posts from January, 2016

The ministry of John the baptist.

What Jesus’s first prophet was up to. Mark 1.2-6 • Matthew 3.1-6 • Luke 3.1-6 • John 1.6-8 John 1.6-8 KWL 6 A person came who’d been sent by God, named John, 7 who came to testify. When he testified about the light, everyone might believe because of him. 8 He wasn’t the light, but he’d testify about the light. 9 The actual light, who lights every person, was coming into the world. Luke 3.1-3 KWL 1 In the 15th year of Tiberius Caesar’s governance, Pontius Pilatus governing Judea, Antipas Herod as governor over the Galilee, Philip Herod his brother as governor over Ituría and Trachonítis provinces, Lysanias as governor over Abiliní, 2 Annas and Joseph Kahiáfa as head priests, God’s message came through John bar Zechariah, in the countryside. 3 He went into all the land round the Jordan, preaching a baptism of repentance—to have one’s sins forgiven— Mark 1.2-3 KWL 2 Like it’s written in the prophet Isaiah: “Look, I send my agent to your face, who’

Figure out what God wants.

It’s not as complicated as we make it out to be. Too many of us Christians know God expects something of his kids. Loads of us preach it all the time: “God has a wonderful plan for your life. Just seek his face.” Problem is, when we seek his face, it’s only to praise him, not know him. The wonderful plan? We don’t know it, and never bother to find out what it is. In fact a lot of us assume God’s plan is unknowable. It’s part of his secret will , his intricate plan for the universe which has been micromanaged all the way down to every single action we take. Which is secret because—let’s face it—there’s no way any one human can fathom it in all its complexity. Way too many moving parts. God is thinking a billion steps ahead, and if he clued us in just a little, it’d blow our minds. Or, which is more likely, we’d respond like a backseat driver: “You know what you oughta do, God, is this …” and since we have the smallest fraction of information, we’re really in no position to jud

The bible in “the original Greek”: The Septuagint.

SEPTUAGINT sɛp'tu.ə.dʒɪnt noun. An ancient Greek translation of the Old Testament. [Septuagintal sɛp.tu.ə'dʒɪnt.əl adjective. ] When you read the New Testament, and one of the apostles quotes the Old Testament, most of the time they’re not translating it from the original Hebrew. They’re quoting a Greek translation. There wasn’t just one translation. Same as English versions of the bible nowadays, different translators had taken different shots at putting the Hebrew scriptures into Greek. Some Greek-speaking Jew in Jerusalem might put together something like a “King Jonathan’s Version,” or KJV ; some Greek-speaking Jew in Egypt might’ve cobbled together an “Egyptian Standard Version,” or ESV ; some curious gentile in Laodicea might’ve put together a “New Laodicean Translation,” or NLT … I could come up with more hypothetical reasons for these familiar initials, but you get the gist. But over time, copyists smooshed all these different Greek bibles together into one

Dark Christianity.

God is light. For this reason Christians ought not walk in the dark. 1Jn 1.5-10 People don’t bother to read this passage in context, and assume “light” and “dark” has to do with truth versus lies, or revelation versus mysteries. Nope; it has to do with obedience versus sin. Christians shouldn’t sin, and when we live in light, we oughta stay out of sin. But more than that. We shouldn’t fixate on sin either. We shouldn’t obsess about what sinners are up to. We shouldn’t analyze the devil’s works in order to understand it better, Rv 2.24 on the pretense that knowledge is power. Our strength isn’t mean to come through our studies of devilish strategies: We’re to be strong through God’s power. Ep 6.10 Resist temptation. Lead others to the light. However, there are loads of Christians who firmly believe a significant part of our duties—if not our only duty—is to study sin, fight it, and condemn it. In preparation these folks spend an awful lot of time on the dark side of Chri

Jesus of Nazareth, child prodigy.

A reminder to his parents of whom they were raising. Luke 2.41-52 Growing up, I’ve usually heard this story taught this way: Jesus, now that he’s old enough to go to temple, went there with the folks for Passover. Afterwards, he stuck around and got into an interesting chat with the rabbis, and lost utter track of time. Extending into days , if you can believe he never noticed the need to sleep, eat, pee, etc. Meanwhile his unwitting parents got halfway back to Nazareth before finally noticing their son was absent. They turned back, finally found him talking shop in temple, and Mary rebuked him: “Your father and I were worried!” But Jesus came back with, “I was doing the work of my real Father.” But, in order to maintain appearances—in order to look like an ordinary human boy, instead of exposing the fact he was secretly a God-boy—Jesus went back to Nazareth with them. Back to their confining, non-intellectual existence. Behaving himself, quietly waiting for another 18 years

How Jesus became “Jesus the Nazarene.”

Imagine calling him “Jesus the Bethlehemite.” Hmm. Well, we’d have got used to it. Matthew 2.19-23. As we know from Luke , both Mary and Joseph were originally from Nazareth, but had to go to Bethlehem for survey reasons, and Jesus was born while they were there. But Matthew never told that part of the story; only that Jesus was born in Bethlehem. Mt 2.1 If all you had was that gospel, you’d think that’s where they lived already. And maybe that’s what the author of Matthew believed. ’Cause what happened was after Joseph took the family to Egypt to escape Herod’s mad little bout of infanticide, God finally lets him know it’s safe to return… and in returning Joseph “came to settle in a city called Nazareth,” Mt 2.23 KWL which implies he hadn’t already settled in Nazareth, and just hadn’t been home in a while. Well. Assuming, as most of us do, that Jesus was born around the year 7 BC ; that he was about two-ish when Herod came a-killing (round 5 BC ), and that the reason t

Does Jesus call himself Messiah?

As I pointed out in my piece on Historical Jesus, a number of skeptics claim Jesus didn’t say and do everything we read in the gospels. Or anything . Once they’re done revising him, turns out Jesus did no miracles, wasn’t resurrected, taught nothing, wasn’t even born . He was entirely fabricated by overzealous apostles. Hogwash, but popular hogwash. ’Cause if Jesus isn’t anything, they don’t have to follow him. And they really don’t wanna, so it’s quite fortuitous for them he turns out to not be anything. It’s almost as if they loaded the dice, innit? Anyway. The reason I bring ’em up is because every so often, one of the Historical Jesus revisionists’ claims winds up worming its way into Christendom. This is not necessarily a bad thing. The revisionists do like to point out baby Jesus wasn’t really visited by magi while he was still in the manger, and it turns out they’re right; it was years later. Skeptics can be mighty useful when they poke holes in popular culture’s myth

Getting drenched in the Holy Spirit.

Spirit baptism is a controversial topic. ’Cause it involves power, and people either covet power, or fear it. Luke 3.16-17 KWL 16 In reply John told everyone, “Indeed I baptize you in water. And one stronger than me comes. I’m not able to loose his sandal strap. He’ll baptize you in the Holy Spirit and fire. 17 The winnowing-shovel is in his hand to thoroughly clean his threshing-floor. He’ll gather together the grain in his silo. He’ll burn up the straw with endless fire.” Getting baptized , ritually washed, in water was not a new idea for John the Baptist’s listeners. Any time they wanted to be clean for worship, they baptized themselves and waited till sundown. John’s baptism, for those who were repentant of their sins, was a little different. But Jesus’s baptism would be way different. It involved the Holy Spirit. And fire. Before Jesus ascended to heaven, he told his students to wait in Jerusalem for that baptism, Ac 1.4-5 and 10 days later this happened: Acts

The magi and the monstrous king.

How Jesus’s birth got the attention of the powerful… and the infamous. Matthew 2.1-18. Both Mešíakh /“Messiah” and Hrístos /“Christ” mean king . It’s a fact most Christians forget. Either we translate these words literally and assume they only mean anointed , or we mix ’em up with the meaning of “Jesus” and figure they mean savior . We treat Christ like Jesus’s surname, and forget it’s his title. And we forget you couldn’t just wander around ancient Israel and call yourself Messiah or Christ. There were other people who laid claim to that title. Powerful people. Homicidal people. Like Herod the Great, who was only “great” because of all his building projects; as a human being Herod was a monster. Emperor Augustus used to joke he’d rather be Herod’s pig than his son. Herod did execute two of his sons, and since Edomites didn’t eat pork, Augustus’s comment was quite apt. How’d baby Jesus get on Herod’s bad side? Well, you might know parts of the story, and if you don’t I’m g