
John 19.25-27.
Only John has this story. Which has caused no end of speculation about Jesus’s family situation.
John 19.25-27 KWL - 25 Standing by Jesus’s cross were his mother, his mother’s sister Salomé,
- Mary wife of Clopas, and Mary the Magdalene.
- 26 So Jesus, seeing his mother and the student he loved standing by,
- told his mother, “Ma’am, look: Your son.”
- 27 Then Jesus told the student, “Look: Your mother.”
- From that hour on, Jesus’s student took her as his own.
John’s list of
Anyway. All these people at the cross, save
But y’notice despite all this family around, Jesus’s siblings weren’t there.
And there’s no reason they wouldn’t be. Jesus was killed the day before Passover.
Only their mother, their aunts, and their cousin John had the guts to be there for Jesus. They did not.
So as the only male family member present, who was there for Jesus to call upon? Right: His beloved student.
Who was the head of Jesus’s family?
Americans like myself tend to be pragmatic. We figure the person best suited to any job should get it. And all things being equal, we’re okay with giving it to the person who wants it most… or the person who shows up first. So for most of us, Jesus’s decision to have John look after his mom makes perfect sense.
For other cultures—including Jesus’s!—no it doesn’t. There are rules about this sort of thing. Well, customs.
One would figure the head of Jesus’s family would be
The other part of the reason Christians imagine an older Joseph is to explain Jesus’s siblings.
But that theory generates some giant problems.
Starting with
Various Christians try to claim James ran the family while Jesus was away, and maybe he did… though I think it’s more likely their mom did. But if James was in any way in charge, Jesus would have no power to say, “Take care of Mom.” Yeah, I’ve heard Christians claim Jesus had special authority as John’s rabbi and Lord; yeah, as an American this scenario makes sense. But I’m not allowed to presume first-century Galileans would think like Americans! It’s possible, but way more likely Jesus did have the cultural right to pick someone to care for his mom. He could assign the task to his cousin without it later getting overruled by his brother.
Lastly, some Christians imagine Jesus passed over James and his siblings because they were otherwise incapable. Too young, maybe. Too immature. Not Christian enough. Arguments which are kinda moot considering Jesus, right after he rose from the dead, appeared to James,
Suffering because she’s suffering.
Eight days after Jesus was born, a prophet had spoken with Mary.
Luke 2.34-35 KWL - 34 Symeón blessed them and said to Mary his mother, “Look:
- This is laid out for the downfall and rise of many in Israel, and they’ll speak out against the sign.
- 35 You yourself: A sword will pass through your soul.
- It’s so that every mind’s thoughts may be revealed.”
Most Christians figure watching her son die was the “sword through your soul” Symeón spoke of. ’Cause what parent wants to watch their beloved child die? It’s like getting stabbed in the gut. (Not heart; that’d kill you. Gut, so you’d suffer.)
Mary might’ve heard Jesus’s prophecies that he’d die, but rise again three days later. His students certainly had. For all the good it did ’em: His death still drove them into panic, despair, heartbreak. It’s really difficult to see past a gory spectacle. It’s a huge stretch of one’s faith. And even though Mary had tons of faith—enough to give birth to Jesus, obviously—did she have enough faith to expect her son to rise in a few days? I dunno. Those who make the movies and art really don’t; they always depict her as grief-stricken. Me, I figure this was a massive test of anyone’s faith, but I’d like to think Mary was up to this sort of challenge. But I really don’t know.
Well. Even if Mary totally believed Jesus would rise, it was still completely awful to watch her son suffer on the cross. And it had to make Jesus miserable to think he couldn’t do a thing to comfort her. Best he could do was have John comfort her for him.
Then,

