
Galatians 2.6-10 KWL - 6 As for the apostles of note:
- Being “someone,” whatever one might be, doesn’t matter to me.
- God doesn’t regard a person’s appearance.
- The apostles of note contribute nothing to me—
- 7 on the contrary.
- They were merely observing I had been entrusted
- with the gospel to “foreskins,”
- just as Simon Peter to the circumcised.
- 7 For the power granted to Peter
- as apostle to the circumcised
- empowers me as well towards the gentiles.
- 8 Recognizing the grace given to me,
- James, Peter, and John, the “pillars” of note,
- placed their hands on me and Barnabas in fellowship,
- so we would go to the gentiles,
- and they to the circumcised.
- 9 They only asked that we remember the poor,
- which I myself also do my best to do.
At the time of
These were “the apostles of note”
And Paul shrugged at them: “Being ‘someone,’ whatever one might be, doesn’t matter to me. God doesn’t regard a person’s appearance.”
Which is entirely true. It’s exactly what the L
1 Samuel 16.7 KJV - But the L
ORD said unto Samuel, Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for the LORD seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart.
Not that the L
This, Paul recognized. They were apostles… but he and Barnabas
So yeah, if you’re reading any level of sarcasm into Paul’s description of these notable apostles (“whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me,” as one might read the
“On the contrary.”
Likewise Paul’s statement in verse 7,
- They contribute nothing to me;
- on the contrary, [they take away from me.]
Yes that could be one way of logically interpreting “on the contrary.” It’d be wrong though. How about this one instead?
- They contribute nothing to me;
- on the contrary, [I contribute to them.]
Which is exactly what Paul described in the verses thereafter.
James, Peter, and John were all from the province of the Galilee, but at the time they were stationed in Judea, ministering to Judeans. To fellow Jews. Only to fellow Jews; there weren’t many
Now, that mission later changed. As I said, Peter moved on to Rome, and John to Ephesus. And yes, there were some exceptions to this ministry; you recall the Holy Spirit had Peter present the gospel to Romans,
Whereas others, like Barnabas and Paul, were gonna be headquartered in Syria, which meant they were gonna be deeply surrounded by gentiles. Not many Jews there! So clearly their mission was to Syrian Greek gentiles; same as James, Peter, and John’s mission was to Judean Jews; same as a Galilee church’s mission would be to Galilean Jews, same as a Galatian church’s mission would be to Galatian gentiles. You work with what there is in the place the Holy Spirit puts you.
James, Peter, and John could have tried to spread out their mission and cover nearby provinces, but they’d have been stretched very thin… and usually the Holy Spirit isn’t a big fan of this technique. Even though we nowadays have the technology to do it, the Spirit still prefers to have people in-country, doing things from within, raising up Christians from that nation who will eventually take over the ministry so that foreigners won’t have to be shipped in to do it. In any event they didn’t have to arrange to travel back and forth to Syria and run the Antioch church; Barnabas and Paul did that. They had the mission to the gentiles… same as Peter to “the circumcised.”
And importantly, these notable apostles saw no reason to interfere with the Holy Spirit’s setup. Nor pull rank, and demand Barnabas and Paul do things their way. The only order they gave them, if we can call it that… is really the same order our Lord gives all of us. We’re to remember the poor. Too many Christians
Paul and the notable apostles were all on the same team, following Jesus. It’s in no way an us-versus-them situation. Don’t read anything competitive, nor hostile, into this passage.
