23 July 2023

The first time Jesus cured anyone.

John 4.46-54.

While Jesus and his students were staying in Cana (where they didn’t respect him as a prophet, so he didn’t have to deal with people seeking “Jesus the Prophet” all day), a certain royal showed up. Probably specifically to seek him out: Someone did seek Jesus the Prophet.

John 4.46 KWL
46 Jesus goes again to Cana of Galilee,
where he made the water wine.
A certain royal is there,
whose son in Capharnaum is sick.

John calls him a βασιλικὸς/vasilikós, “a royal.” Not a king, but someone in the royal family; debatably a servant in the royal household, but that’s far less likely. Could be someone who might actually become king himself someday, but if that’s so you’d think John woulda named names.

Both John Wycliffe and the Geneva Bible translated vasilikós as “little king.” But for some reason the King James translated it “nobleman,” and that concept has kinda stuck in translators’ heads ever since. You get “royal official” (Amplified, CSB, NASB, NET, NIV, NRSV), “government official” (ISV, GNB, and NLT), plain ’ol “official” (ESV), and of course “nobleman” (NKJV, MEV).

Regardless, he was a big deal—and word leaked to him Jesus might be the sort of person who could do miracles. And when you’re desperate, you’ll jump all over that sort of rumor. So this royal saddled up, rode 30 kilometers across the province, and called upon some obscure Nazarene rabbi.

John 4.47 KWL
Once this royal heard
Jesus comes from Judea to the Galilee,
he goes to Jesus
and asks whether Jesus might come down
and cure his son,
for he’s about to die.

Could Jesus cure the son? He hadn’t cured anyone yet.

Note the royal didn’t order Jesus to Capharnaum to cure his son. ’Cause this royal knew his bible. You don’t order men of God to do stuff. You should be aware they might call fire down upon you.

2 Kings 1.9-12 KWL
9 King Akhazyá sends Elijah a captain and his unit of 50.
The captain goes to Elijah.
Look, Elijah sits on top of a hill.
The captain tells him, “Man of God!
The king said come down!”
10 In reply Elijah tells the captain of 50,
“If I am a man of God,
fire from the heavens will come down
and devour you and your 50.”
And fire comes down from the heavens,
and devours him and his 50.
11 Again King Akhazyá sends Elijah another captain and his unit of 50.
In reply the captain tells Elijah, “Man of God!
The king now says come down quickly!
12 In reply Elijah tells him,
“If I am a man of God,
fire from the heavens will come down
and devour you and your fifty.”
And God’s fire from heaven comes down,
and devours him and his 50.

Jesus absolutely has more patience than Elijah, and is not at all a fan of calling down fire upon people. Lk 9.54-56 God certainly doesn’t send down fire on a regular basis! It’s rare, and in the Old Testament it was only done to people who were entirely unrepentant. As King Akhazyá ben Ahab (KJV “Ahaziah”) was; as his captains and troops no doubt were. The Ephraimites needed to learn respect, and it shouldn’t have taken the destruction of two units to learn the lesson.

Nevertheless this royal knew better: You don’t approach men of God with arrogance, pride, and the presumption they oughta obey their betters. You ask for their help. Politely.

Besides, the royal didn’t know whether Jesus could. The only miracles Jesus had performed thus far in John as the water-to-wine thingy, and his prophecies—which totally count, although for some odd reason most folks don’t associate prophecy with miracles. Hey, if God empowers it, it’s a miracle.

So that’s not a lot to go on. But if God empowers a person with something so frivolous-sounding as providing wine for a wedding, why can’t he empower that person to cure some important guy’s son? It’s not flimsy reasoning.

It feels like flimsy reasoning to some Christians, who speculate Jesus had to have done more miracles than the water-to-wine and the prophecy. Maybe some of the other miracles in the other gospels, like the exorcism in the synagogue, and that evening Jesus cured everybody in Capharnaum? But John is telling us what happened before Jesus moved to Capharnaum. He hadn’t yet! And at the end of this story, John states about this miracle,

John 4.54 KWL
This again is the second wonder Jesus does
as he comes out of Judea to the Galilee.

…the first wonder being the water-to-wine event. Jn 2.11

But what various Christians do is take the statement “[as] he comes out of Judea to the Galilee,” and insist it means it’s only the second miracle he did in the Galilee—but Jesus did other miracles, not recorded, down south in Judea. Like tell Nathanael he saw him. Surely there are other miraculous tales trailing Jesus, which is how this royal could identify him as a proper faith-healer.

And yeah, maybe there were other tales… but if so, they were pure fictional gossip. John is relating what actually did happen, and John says nothing else did.

But y’know, if you’re desperate, you’re not really gonna care how many stories there are, and whether they’ve all been properly vetted. You’re gonna go to Jesus and ask whether he can help. If he can, awesome! If not, move on to the next rumored miracle-worker.

Challenging our faith.

Elsewhere in the gospels, when people came to Jesus with a request, often they harbored doubts about whether he could do it. So Jesus tends to challenge their faith, and snap ’em out of it. And he still does this, y’know.

You might remember the story of the guy whose son had seizures. He had his doubts, and Jesus got him to respond, “I believe, but help my unbelief!” Mk 9.24 Which is a really good response. Jesus came to earth to grow faith, and if we come to him with partial faith, he’s gonna insist on stretching it further before he acts. Then and now.

As he did with this royal.

John 4.48-50 KWL
48 So Jesus tells the royal,
“When there are no wonders or omens you people can see,
you can’t believe.”
49 The royal tells Jesus, “Master,
come down before my child is dead!”
50 Jesus tells the royal, “Go home.
Your son lives.”
The person believes the word which Jesus tells him,
and is going.

Jesus’s response tends to be interpreted as if it’s only directly to the royal: “If you don’t see, you don’t believe.” But the you is plural: Jesus isn’t addressing this guy specifically, but everyone generally. For most people, seeing is believing.

At first glance this statement doesn’t sound very sympathetic of Jesus. The royal is understandably worried about his kid, but Jesus responds with a rhetorical statement abou belief. Since we know Jesus is kind, what’s going on here?

Simple: He’s being a teacher. (He’s doing his job!) It’s not just Jesus and the royal in this conversation; he’s surrounded by his kids, and he’s trying to show them—and us—how faith and miracles and faith-healing works. He’s also trying to teach this lesson to the royal: “If you can’t see, you don’t believe. Now I’m gonna teach you how to not be so small-minded.”

Interpreting this as a challenge to his faith—and yes, it totally was—the royal bucked up and made a decisive request of Jesus: “Master, come down.” And Jesus didn’t grant his request precisely that way, because he didn’t need to. But he did grant the royal’s wish. He cured the son immediately, and told the royal to go home.

Not that the royal knew yet his son had been cured. But that’s how quickly Jesus can respond once we stop waffling, and take those leaps of faith he wants from us. The royal threw his entire trust upon Jesus, and Jesus lived up to it.

The faithless reinterpretation.

You wanna know the messed-up thing: I grew up in cessationist churches, who claimed miracles only happened back in bible times, but not since. They have the same bibles we do, where miracles abound, but they don’t think of these stories as lessons which show us what miracles look like when we do them again; they think of them as stories which prove Jesus came from God, and that’s all. Not lessons.

And in fact they’ll twist the verses in these stories to try to discourage people away from the miraculous and supernatural:

John 4.48 KJV
Then said Jesus unto him, Except ye see signs and wonders, ye will not believe.

Jesus, they claim, was irritated by all the requests and demands for miracles. He didn’t wanna show signs and wonders. He’s not a carnival magician! He wants to teach the Sermon on the Mount, then die for our sins, then return to heaven and get ready for the second coming, then have the second coming and rule the world. And that’s all. Doesn’t wanna do signs and wonders. Doesn’t want us to request signs and wonders. He only wants us to believe. Regardless.

Yet for some reason he kept curing people anyway. Cured the son of this pesky royal. But grudgingly; Jesus did it to shut the guy up and make him go away. He didn’t do it out of love, compassion, patience, kindness, generosity, sympathy, nor to grow faith. Nor any of the other fruitful reasons which aren’t just character traits of God himself, but traits he wants to grow in us. It was solely to get this annoying guy out of his hair.

Then said Jesus unto him, Except ye see signs and wonders, ye will not believe. But today I guess I’ll throw you a bone. Hocus pocus, your kid’s cured. Now go away.

And that was then, they continue: Don’t you ever waste Jesus’s time on such a thing. Don’t you ever ask God to heal your sick kids, and make it a condition for your faith: “God, if you can’t come through for me, what’s the point of you?” We’re not supposed to base our faith on our real-world interactions with God; it’s meant to entirely be on bible. Not miracles. Not testimonies.

Problem is, this faithless, fleshly interpretation contradicts the whole purpose of John’s gospel.

John 20.30-31 KWL
30 Indeed, Jesus did many other wonders in front of his students
which aren’t written in this book.
31 These wonders were written,
so all of you can believe Jesus is the Christ, God’s son;
so in believing, you can have life in his name.

The bible is testimonies. It’s made up of the best testimonies. And there are many, many other testimonies. Generations of Christians who’ve seen and experienced Jesus for themselves, whose word can also be trusted. Whose experiences are consistent with the scriptures, ’cause they’re done by the same living God. A God who ceased? That’s a dead God, and it turns the bible into dead history, not a living word.

Both in context, and in common sense, this verse does not mean “Don’t ask for miracles.” Just the opposite. Jesus welcomes requests for miracles.

However, if we make these requests with a rotten, faithless attitude—kinda like we’ll find in a skeptical cessationist who smugly dismisses a faith-healer with unbelief and mockery—don’t expect Jesus to welcome that.

When acted upon, faith spreads.

True, Jesus could’ve gone with the royal to Capharnaum, cured his son, and there’d be much rejoicing, and belief. But how Jesus chose to do it worked too: Before he went home, the royal met his slaves, and they brought him good news.

John 4.51-54 KWL
51 Now as the royal went down,
his slaves come to meet him,
saying that his child lives.
52 So the royal asked of the slaves
the hour the son had recovered,
so they tell him this: “Yesterday.
The fever left him the seventh hour after sunrise.”
53 So the father knows this is the hour
in which Jesus tells him, “Your son lives.” Jn 4.50
He believes—he and his whole house.
54 This again is the second wonder Jesus does
as he comes out of Judea to the Galilee.

The royal and Jesus had spoken in “the seventh hour,” meaning seven hours after sunrise; anywhere between 12:30PM in summer, and 1:30PM in winter. Let’s figure it till 2PM to have that conversation. Is that enough time for the royal to get home? Actually yeah; Capharnaum was 26½km from Cana, and most likely the royal had a horse, and if the horse merely walked he’d get home in four hours. At a trot or gallup, faster. Totally doable.

I’m betting the slaves had horses, and rode as fast as they could to get him the good news. So less than two hours after meeting with Jesus—when he’d be totally aware how long ago it was, considering how far he’d traveled—the prince met up with his slaves.

Yeah, a skeptic could chalk the timing up to coincidence: Jesus fortuitously said “Your son lives” at around the same time the boy got better. The naysayers in the Galilee might’ve argued it was just a lucky break. Same as naysayers today. Coincidences happen all the time; doesn’t make ’em miracles.

But a foretold coincidence is no coincidence. Whenever a prophet says, “[Long-shot event] will happen,” it wasn’t likely to begin with, and it’s no accident when it does happen. Sick boys, 26½ kilometers away, don’t just recover at the very same instant a rabbi makes the definite statement, “Your son lives.”

So once the royal discovered the fever broke at the same time Jesus had spoken, he believed. And once he told his slaves, they believed. If any of these slaves were gentiles (which is likely; you wouldn’t have to free them every seven years, Lv 25.46 so they’re more cost-effective), it meant these gentiles would now believe in Jesus—and by extension, Jesus’s God. Remember, when you pray to pagan gods to be cured, they’re no help! But Jesus’s God heals instantlyand without any ridiculous incantations or special sacrifices.

We don’t know how devoted this royal and his household remained to Jesus. It may be this guy was Huzá (KJV “Chuza”), Herod’s ἐπιτρόπου/epitrópu, “land supervisor,” whose wife Joanna became one of Jesus’s patrons. Lk 8.3 It may also be that he lost his devotion and appreciation after the cares of this world became too distracting. Mk 4.18-19 John never followed up, so we can’t say. I prefer the first idea of course, but I’m an optimist.