Matthew 2.4-6.
Christian myths say there were only three
But the magi, and possibly their entourage, left Jerusalem abuzz—all the more because they were asking about the newborn king of Judea,
It didn’t help that
So yeah, he was the wrong person to talk to about some newborn king of Judea. But Herod wasn’t one of those idiots who think they already know it all, and only surrounds himself with toadies who tell him so. He was a crafty old buzzard who knew knowledge is power, and went straight to the priests to learn what was up.
Matthew 2.4-6 KWL 4 Assembling all the people’s head priests and scribes,- Herod is asking them where Messiah is born.
5 They tell Herod, “In Bethlehem, Judea.- For this was written by the prophet:
6 ‘And you,¹ Bethlehem,’—land of Judah—- in no way ‘are the least of the chiefs of Judah:
- A leader will come from you¹
- who will shepherd my people, Israel.’ ”
Mc 5.2
Quoting, of course, the prophet Micah of Morešet-Gath. In English-language bibles this is
Micah 5.2 KWL - You,¹ Bethlehem Efrátah, little among Judah’s clans:
- From you¹ will come forth
- one who becomes the ruler of Israel.
- His origin is of ancient times,
- from eternal days.
The scribes left out that last part, ’cause they figured Herod didn’t need to know that part. He kinda did, though. I’ll get to why in the next section. But Herod was only interested in where Messiah might be—so he could go kill him.
Why give up Messiah’s location so easily?
It was already well-known Herod bar Antipater was a murderous king.
Considering the sort of murderous despot Herod was, why on earth would the scribes give up Messiah’s location so easily? Two reasons.
First, most of the priests were
So since a future, final Messiah was part of Pharisee teachings, and came from other passages in our Old Testament, Sadducees didn’t believe in him. Asking where Messiah would be born is kinda like asking me about Xenu. Scientologists are trying to shush people who talk about Xenu, lest non-Scientologists make fun of them. I don’t believe in Xenu (and figure the cat’s out of the bag anyway), so spilling their secrets doesn’t worry me any. And Sadducees felt the very same way about Messiah. They didn’t care where he might be born, ’cause they didn’t believe he would be born.
Which is probably why Herod called for the priests and their scribes in the first place. Herod wasn’t dumb. He’d been around Jews long enough to know Messiah was one of those Pharisee beliefs Sadducees didn’t care about, so he went straight to the Sadducees, who wouldn’t be hesitant to tell him all about it.
Second, if there were any Pharisees among the scribes, or any Pharisee-friendly scribes: Most Pharisees were
Nevermind all the really awful things Herod might do anyway. Determinists tend not to worry about such things—and it’s mighty naïve of them. There’s a lot God hasn’t foretold, and a lot of evil we might prevent if only we either spoke up, or in this case, kept our mouths shut.
Since the scriptures generally point to Jesus, Herod took advantage of this knowledge to try to kill the newborn Messiah. ’Cause evil people can totally misuse the scriptures for their own evil gain.
Lastly I should bring up the part of Micah which Matthew doesn’t quote. The priests might have read the entire passage to Herod, but then again they might not have; they might’ve only told him the part he wanted to know. But y’notice Micah refers to one whose “origin is of ancient times, from eternal days.” This future ruler is gonna be like the great heroes of mythology. But unlike them, not fiction—he’s gonna do those fantastic things for real. This wouldn’t be someone Herod could easily take down.
Now, Herod might’ve heard this part, and this is why it moved him to kill every toddler in Bethlehem. Or he didn’t, and murdering all the toddlers was just another callous, paranoid atrocity for him. Just another Tuesday.