26 January 2026

Suffering for goodness.

1 Peter 4.1-6.

You remember in 1 Peter 3.18, Simon Peter wrote, “Christ Jesus once also suffered for sins… so that he could bring us to God, putting us to death in the flesh and making us alive in the Spirit.” (My translation.) In today’s passage he bounces back to that idea. Jesus suffered, and in so doing conquered sin.

And y’know, if we suffer, we can kinda conquer sin:

1 Peter 4.1-6 KWL
1So, about Christ suffering in the flesh:
Prepare yourselves² as well with the same mindset.
For one who suffers in the flesh prevents sin;
2is no longer into human desires,
but the rest of the time they’re in the flesh,
is into God’s will.
3The past was plenty of time
to achieve the desires of gentiles—
living in unchastity, lust, drunkenness,
partying, drinking, breaking the law for idols.
4They’re surprised you don’t join them in these things;
in the same flood of indecency as they,
slandering you.
5They will give an account
to the One who has to judge the living and dead,
6This is why the dead are preached to:
Though they are judged by human flesh,
they may yet live by God’s Spirit.

Now yes, there are certain Christians who take this idea “One who suffers in the flesh prevents sin” in verse 1, and put it into practice in very unreasonable ways. They look for ways to suffer. They figure “Suffering builds character,” so they set out to do things in the most challenging, backwards, wasteful, ridiculous ways. They put up with abuse, instead of resisting it or getting their abusers rightly prosecuted, because they think they’re meant to suffer. They deprive themselves of healthy things, and fast way longer than is medically safe. They reject medical treatment and ordinary comforts. They whip and cut themselves. They seek out the sort of people who would murder them, because they want to be martyred.

Christians have been doing this stuff throughout Christian history. And unless they were following the explicit orders of the Holy Spirit, they were wrong to do it. Yes, life is suffering, but Jesus has conquered the world, Jn 16.33 and there’s no reason for us to suffer unnecessarily. There’s plenty enough suffering in our lives! Family and friends die, accidents and disasters happen, we lose money, we lose our health. There’s lots we can’t prevent—without adding more to it, just because we’ve fooled ourselves into thinking random suffering makes us righteous.

In context, Peter is writing about the pushback his audience got from pagans who couldn’t understand why they were no longer living like pagans—who could no longer even condone pagan behavior.

“You used to be fun.”

Today’s Christians are often in the same boat as Peter’s Christians. Friends notice we used to party with them. We used to get sloppy drunk, to have random recreational sex, to experiment with unfamiliar types of depravity on the grounds “you only live once”, to bend the rules because Mammon empowered us to get away with it, and all the other “fun” things they still indulge in. And now we’re all pious and antisocial and no fun anymore, and rejecting their behavior feels to them like we’re rejecting them. And how dare we. What, we think we’re better than them?

In the United States, Christianity is so commonplace we don’t get that much pushback whenever we “get religion.” Most people are aware this might happen, and their favorite lowlifes might someday repent and reform—especially after one arrest too many, or after they finally hit rock bottom and go to rehab. But in the Roman Empire, so many religions permitted, if not endorsed, so much wanton behavior, Christianity (and Judaism) looked like a freakish cult to them, and pushback came hard. Often it even turned into persecution.

So what kind of suffering is Peter really talking about? Obviously, denying the works of the flesh. Our fleshly desires want us to drink, get stoned, and fornicate like animals. But God calls us to be better than that. Fleshly people don’t understand this, and we’ll have to put up with their objections. Between resisting our own flesh, and resisting their flesh, that’s the suffering Peter means.

If you indulged in that stuff before, you devoted more than enough time to that. You’re done now. You should want to be done now: God has so much better in mind for you.

Peter grew up Pharisee, and likely never had that lifestyle, and as you can see it horrified him. Those of us who grow up Christian, especially Fundamentalist, will likewise be horrified by pagan behavior. Peter’s mindset was, “Well, they’re gonna get theirs—someday they’ll stand before Jesus for all their wickedness.” And yeah, that’s largely true. Many will never repent, and rebel against God till their very bitter end.

But our mindset should reflect Jesus’s. Who ate with sinners; who came to seek and save the lost. These pagans who try to drag us back into the muck with them: They’re gonna hit rock bottom themselves at some point. Which means they’re gonna need us someday. They’re gonna need our sympathy, and our help to get ’em out of it, and point them to Jesus.

I’m not saying Peter is wrong. All things being equal, destruction is exactly where they’re headed. But if there’s any chance to save them, let’s take it.

“This is why the dead are preached to.”

Verse 6 confuses a lot of Christians—because we don’t preach to the dead. That’s not been our practice. You don’t see preachers go to cemeteries and funeral homes to address the corpses. We preach to the living.

And rather than study the history of the first Christians, and try to understand what Peter meant by this, too many Christians simply try to reason it out for themselves. The NIV, fr’instance, inserts the word “now” into the text—

1 Peter 4.6 NIV
6AFor this is the reason the gospel was preached even to those who are now dead…

—even though there’s no Greek word which could be translated “now.” But this way, Christians can argue Peter meant people who used to be alive—the gospel was preached to ’em then. But now they’re dead. The NASB does something similar by adding the footnote, “i.e. preached in their lifetimes.” Somehow Peter can’t really mean preached to the dead.

Ancient Christians kinda thought the same way. They tried to argue Peter meant people who are dead in sin—those who are spiritually dead. Not literally. This is about preaching to the lost, instead of only to Christians. This explanation actually makes better sense than “preached to those who are now dead.” I still think it’s incorrect though.

Other ancient Christians—and many of today’s Christians—think this refers to “the harrowing of hell,” the Christian myth that during the three days he was dead, Jesus went to the afterlife and preached the gospel there—to the dead. That’s where the dead were preached to. And some of ’em will even claim the dead in hell are still preached to, and offered an extra chance to repent and turn to Jesus, now that they understand how awful their afterlife will be. If you’ve ever read C.S. Lewis’s The Great Divorce, it’s entirely based on this idea—because Lewis believed the gospel was preached to the dead. (It’s one of Lewis’s many old-school Anglican beliefs which his many Evangelical fans downplay as much as possible.)

My belief is based on the second part of this verse: “Though they are judged by human flesh, they may yet live by God’s Spirit.” Peter was speaking of the adjudicated dead—people who’d been sentenced to death by their sins. “Dead men walking,” as today’s saying goes. Whether he meant people whom the Roman courts had sentenced to death, or people whose sinful lifestyle was rapidly destroying them before our eyes, these people were good as dead. But God still loves ’em. Jesus still died for them. Salvation is still available.

Yeah, it’s mighty similar to the ancient Christians’ idea of being dead in sin. But “dead in sin” can mean an unrepentant sinner who’s got a whole lot of sinful years ahead of ’em. What I’m thinking of—what I believe Peter was thinking of—is someone who’s perishing right now. Who doesn’t have long. Who really is as good as dead. But let’s share Jesus with them all the same. Jesus takes dying confessions.