Mark 1.9-11,
Matthew 3.13-17,
Luke 3.21-22.
Baptism, i.e. ritual washing, was usually for Jews who were
And John the baptist co-opted the ritual too, and used it on sinners
Mark 1.9 KWL - It happens in these days Jesus comes from Nazareth of the Galilee,
- and is baptized by John in the Jordan.
Matthew 3.13-15 KWL 13 Then Jesus comes from the Galilee to the Jordan,- to John, to be baptized by him.
14 John is preventing him, saying,- “I need to be baptized by you¹!
- And you¹ come to me?”
15 In reply Jesus told him, “Just permit it.- It’s appropriate for us to fulfill everything that’s right.”
- So John permitted him.
As you see, when Jesus came south from the Galilee, went to the Jordan, and wanted baptism, John rightly objected. I’ll write it again: Rightly objected. John’s baptism was for sinners. Was Jesus a sinner? Nope. Did Jesus need to repent? Nope; never sinned, so nothing to repent of.
Well we would, but we’d never call Jesus a hypocrite. So we usually look the other way at this, and give Jesus a free pass.
Yet at the same time, continue to teach that Jesus didn’t need repentance, and underwent baptism so he could be a good example for Christians who actually need to repent. In other words, we teach he was totally behaving like something he’s not—that he was acting like a hypocrite.
Should we be teaching such a thing in the first place? If Jesus is no hypocrite, should we be teaching anything at all which could, on closer inspection, easily make Jesus out to be a hypocrite?
I would say no; and also Jesus has a legitimate, non-hypocritical reason for wanting baptism. Let’s get to that.