30 April 2023

Meeting Jesus on the Emmaus road.

Luke 24.13-27.

Jesus’s resurrection happened the day after Passover. The Law required every able-bodied Israeli to go to Jerusalem for Passover and celebrate it there. Dt 16.16 That done, they could all go home, and that seems to be what two of Jesus’s students were doing in the Emmaus Road story: Going home. Passover was over, Jesus was (as far as they knew) dead, and while they heard from the women he was alive, they didn’t know what to do with this information… and it didn’t matter; they had stuff to do at home. So they were going home.

Emmaus is probably Emmaus Nicopolis. A number of Christians insist it can’t be, because Luke says Emmaus was 60 stadia from Jerusalem (i.e. 7 miles, 11km), and Emmaus Nicopolis is 161 stadia (15½ miles, 25km) away. Never mind Luke describes Emmaus as ἀπέχουσαν/apéhusan, “far off,” and 7 miles is not far off; you could run that in an hour.

Me, I think it’s far more likely some overzealous bible copyist incorrectly wrote ἑξήκοντα/exíkonta, “sixty,” instead of ἑκατὸν ἑξήκοντα/ekatón exíkonta, “hundred sixty,” and that error snuck into all our bibles. None of the other archaeological discoveries 60 stadia away from Jerusalem have been satisfactory. Meanwhile Christians for centuries have been claiming Emmaus Nicopolis is the place. Ancient Christians even built a church there over St. Cleopas’s house, which was still standing in Eusebius Pamphili’s time. (He was the bishop of Caesarea, Judea, from 314 to 339. He knew the area.) It’s not unreasonable to figure these guys could cover 161 stadia (i.e. 15½ miles, 25km) in a spring afternoon. That’s a five-hour walk… and, as it’ll come up later, a two-hour run.

I mentioned Cleopas ’cause Luke identifies Cleopas as one of the students in this story. Κλεόπας/Kleópas is a Greek name, the male equivalent of Cleopatra, meaning “glory to the father,” or in a Jew’s case “glory to the Father.” Eusebius identifies him as Jesus’s uncle, the brother of Joseph, and the father of Jesus’s cousin Simon, who later became the head of the Jerusalem church after Jesus’s brother James was killed. Since the Emmaus Road story ends with the statement, “The Lord is risen indeed, and hath appeared to Simon,” Lk 24.34 KJV it may very well be that the other student in this story is this Simon—namely Jesus’s cousin Simon. Hey, they both lived in Emmaus.

So it’s kinda cool that Jesus’s uncle and cousin were both following him, and it makes sense that they’d be among the first people he appeared to. Let’s get to the first part of the story.

Luke 24.13-27 KWL
13 Look, two of the students, on the same day,
are going to a far-off village whose name is Emmaús,
60 stadia [7 miles, 11 km] from Jerusalem.
14 The students are talking with one another
about all the things which just happened.
15 It happens, during their animated conversation,
Jesus himself comes near, going with them.
16 The students’ eyesight isn’t strong;
they don’t know it’s Jesus.
17 Jesus tells them, “What are these words
you throw to one another as you’re walking?”
The students stand still, gloomy-looking.
18 In reply, one of the students, named Cleopas,
tells Jesus, “You alone visit Jerusalem,
and don’t know what happens in it these days?”
19 Jesus tells them, “What happened?”
The students tell him the events about Jesus the Nazarene.
How he’s a man—a prophet—
of mighty work and word before God and all the people.
20 How Jesus is betrayed to our head priests and rulers,
is sentenced to death, and they crucify him.
21 “And we were expecting that he’s Israel’s coming redeemer…
but regardless, it’s the third day after these things happened.
22 But certain women among us are confusing us:
Going to the sepulcher in the morning
23 and not finding Jesus’s body,
they come back speaking of seeing an angelic vision;
they say he’s alive.
24 Some who are with us, go to the sepulcher,
and find it’s just as the women say,
but we don’t see him.”
25 Jesus tells them, “Oh, you dummies.
Slow in your heart to trust all the prophets who speak.
26 Don’t these things have to be suffered by Messiah
to enter into his glory?”
27 And beginning with Moses and all the prophets,
Jesus expounds for them everything written about himself.

Arguing all the way home.

As Cleopas and Simon head home, they’re talking about what happened to Jesus in Jerusalem… and arguing about it. You might miss that fact, depending on your favorite bible translation:

Luke 24.13-27 NIV
13 They were talking with each other about everything that had happened. 15 As they talked and discussed these things with each other, Jesus himself came up and walked along with them; 16 but they were kept from recognizing him.
17A He asked them, “What are you discussing together as you walk along?”

Sounds kinda like they were having a quiet conversation, weren’t they? But no, it wasn’t that. Verse 15 says they happened ὁμιλεῖν/omileín, “to converse,” and συζητεῖν/suziteín, “to dispute.” Emotions were high, you know—one of their close family members had just been horribly killed two days ago, and just this morning some of the women were insisting he’s alive, and his body was obviously not in the sepulcher. What were they to think?

Jesus himself commented about the way they were talking to one another: “What are these words you throw to one another as you’re walking?” Lk 24.17 KWL It’s a literal translation of ἀντιβάλλετε/antivállete, “you [all] banter.” It’s not a polite conversation; it’s a father and son talking at one another more so than with one another. We’d like to think these are good Christians coming together in one accord, but if you know any actual real-life Christians, you know we don’t do that as often as we oughta. And if we’re related, the over-familiarity we have with one another sometimes looks mighty rude to outsiders.

It might be this over-familiarity which made Jesus comfortable with addressing them as ὦ ἀνόητοι/o anóiti, “oh mindless ones,” which I translated as the more casual, “oh you dummies.” To be fair they didn’t understand what was going on, even though he’d told his students more than once what was about to happen. But they, same as all of them, kept falling back on what Pharisees had taught them in synagogue about the End Times, and weren’t aware Jesus was trying to un-teach all this theory and tell ’em how things really work. Yeah, the Son of Man enters his glory and rules the world… but the suffering servant of Isaiah? That’s the Son of Man too. And that has to happen first. And it just happened, this very weekend. And it’s done now!

I’m kinda jumping ahead of things. Before Jesus spells this out for them, lookit what Cleopas and Simon thought they knew.

Luke 24.19-24 KWL
19B The students tell him the events about Jesus the Nazarene.
How he’s a man—a prophet—
of mighty work and word before God and all the people.
20 How Jesus is betrayed to our head priests and rulers,
is sentenced to death, and they crucify him.
21 “And we were expecting that he’s Israel’s coming redeemer…
but regardless, it’s the third day after these things happened.
22 But certain women among us are confusing us:
Going to the sepulcher in the morning
23 and not finding Jesus’s body,
they come back speaking of seeing an angelic vision;
they say he’s alive.
24 Some who are with us, go to the sepulcher,
and find it’s just as the women say,
but we don’t see him.”

Most translations put the whole passage in quotes, as if Cleopas and Simon say the whole thing; I only put ’em where they move away from the facts about Jesus, to the stuff they weren’t so sure about.

They did believe Jesus to be Messiah. They didn’t use the word “Messiah” themselves, but “Israel’s coming redeemer” is the same thing. Jesus had no trouble using the word in verse 26—he no longer had to worry about getting killed for it, ’cause he’d already been killed for it, and they couldn’t kill him again! The popular Jewish expectation about Messiah was he’d show up, overthrow any foreigners who were occupying Israel (whether Assyrian, neo-Babylonian, Persian, Greek, Egyptian, Seleucid, Roman, Ottoman, British, or whatever), and rule the nation himself; and probably conquer the rest of the world too. He was the Son of Man of Daniel 7, accepting God’s kingdom on behalf of his Father.

But then he got killed. Which they didn’t expect at all. Even though Jesus warned ’em it would happen!—but they were so hung up on how Pharisees spoke of Messiah, they simply couldn’t imagine him outside that Pharisee framework. We have the very same problem in Christianity nowadays: People who insist the End Times have to happen the way the “prophecy scholars” claim. But when they read certain passages of scripture outside the context of “prophecy scholars,” and become fully aware these scriptures don’t mean what the “scholars” claim they do, they even so insist the End Times are gonna turn out the way the “scholars” say. Even though all the proof texts have been completely undermined by proper study. When you want something to be true badly enough, it’s kinda easy to juggle contradictory beliefs in your head.

So that’s the situation here: These guys figured Jesus is Messiah—which he is!—but thought he was a Pharisee-style Messiah, who’d never suffer like that dude in Isaiah 53, and had their hopes completely dashed when he died. So much so, they didn’t expect him to live again; couldn’t fathom that he’d live again; couldn’t believe it when the women told them Jesus is alive.

Okay dummies, Jesus responded, let’s go back to Moses and the prophets. Hey, they had a five-hour walk; that’d be enough time to get them up to speed.

Not recognizing Jesus.

It’s a little hard for most of us to fathom how Jesus’s students and family members didn’t recognize him. There are a few factors which explain it though.

The most obvious is, if you were traveling back then, and the sun’s out and you don’t want sunburn, you’re gonna wear a veil. It wouldn’t necessarily cover your face, unless there’s a sandstorm—but it was spring, and there might’ve been sand whipping through the air, so that’s a possibility. A veil over your mouth would certainly muffle your voice a little.

There’s the fact if you’re absolutely certain someone’s dead—either because you’d personally seen his dead body, or even watched him die—it stands to reason you wouldn’t expect him to walk a dozen miles with you two days later. Especially with pierced ankles! (Those had to completely heal up before Jesus could walk on ’em, which just goes to show us how thorough his resurrection is.) So there’s no way these guys could imagine this was Jesus—even if he had a Jesus-level mastery of the bible, and looked and sounded exactly like Jesus.

There’s also this idea, which I got from Simon Amadeus Pillario’s Word-for-Word Bible Comic: After Jesus was raised, he has white hair. Whether that’s from the trauma of crucifixion, or just part of what his resurrected body looks like, is open for interpretation. But it would explain why people didn’t recognize Jesus right away after he’d been raised; a new hair color can certainly make you look different! And Jesus does have white hair in Revelation. Rv 1.14 So that’s a possibility.

In any event, it didn’t sink in they were talking to Jesus till they had dinner with him. But that’s in the next passage.